UN General Assembly Declares Zionism Racism
The United Nations General Assembly adopted Resolution 3379, which stated that Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination. This resolution was controversial and reflected the ongoing tensions surrounding the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The discussion highlighted various geopolitical dynamics and was indicative of the divided opinions on the Israel-Palestine issue among UN member states. The vote resulted in a significant majority against Israel, with many nations from the Non-Aligned Movement supporting the resolution.
Resolution passed with 72 votes in favor.
Zionism labeled as racism by the UN.
Elicited strong reactions from Israel and allies.
Revoked in 1991 during the Madrid Conference.
What Happened?
Resolution 3379 was passed by the United Nations General Assembly on November 10, 1975, during a time of increasing international polarization regarding the Middle East. The resolution proclaimed that 'Zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination.' This declaration was significant as it reflected the sentiments of numerous countries primarily from the Third World and the Non-Aligned Movement, which were critical of Israel's policies toward Palestinians. The resolution was passed with a vote of 72 in favor, 35 against, and 32 abstentions, illustrating a pronounced division among the member states. A critical factor leading to this resolution was the ongoing Palestinian struggle for self-determination, intensified by the 1967 Six-Day War, which resulted in substantial territorial changes and an increase in Palestinian refugee populations. The rhetoric around Zionism as racism echoed the broader Cold War dynamics, where alignment often correlated with opposition to Western policies and support for anti-colonial movements.The passage of the resolution elicited strong reactions from Israel and its allies, particularly the United States, which regarded the measure as an affront to the Jewish people and an attempt to delegitimize the state of Israel. In response to the backlash, Israel's Foreign Minister Yigal Allon condemned the resolution, arguing that it fostered hatred and division rather than peace. The UN’s action fueled further debate in international forums and civil society, raising questions about the nature of nationalism and its intersection with claims of racism, especially in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian narrative and the broader Arab-Israeli conflict. The resolution was later revoked in 1991 amidst changing political landscapes and processes aimed at peace in the Middle East, notably during the Madrid Conference, but it has remained a contentious symbol in discussions of anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel's state policies.
Why Does it Matter?
Resolution 3379's declaration of Zionism as a form of racism set a precedent for international discourse regarding Israel-Palestine relations and the use of language in political rhetoric. It embodied the deep divisions within the UN regarding the Middle Eastern conflict and laid the groundwork for continued debates around nationalism, colonialism, and human rights. The impact of the resolution reverberated in the UN’s later discussions, shaping the narrative and influencing public perception of the conflict for decades to come.