On November 13, 2000, Speaker of the House Manny Villar took a pivotal step in the unfolding political drama surrounding Philippine President Joseph Estrada by passing articles of impeachment against him. This decision came amid intense scrutiny and growing allegations of corruption, bribery, and abuse of power surrounding Estrada's administration, which had been on shaky ground since rumors of illicit activities began to surface. The vote brought to light the escalating tensions within the Philippine political landscape, as lawmakers weighed the implications of pursuing impeachment against a sitting president.

The impeachment process was seen as a critical response to popular demands for accountability, partly fueled by public outrage over Estrada's alleged involvement in corrupt practices and mismanagement. The articles of impeachment outlined specific charges, including accepting kickbacks and failing to disclose his financial assets. The gravity of passing these articles was felt by many, as it marked a departure from the traditional sentiment of solidarity often shown toward a sitting president in some cultures, indicating a serious shift in political dynamics.

As the political climate worsened, the passing of these articles garnered significant media coverage, leading to mass protests and mobilizations known as the “People Power II” movement. This public sentiment eventually culminated in a broader call for justice and reform, leading to Estrada's eventual removal from office in January of the following year. The impact of this event extended beyond Estrada himself, serving as a catalyst for future political accountability measures in the country.