The impeachment hearings against President Bill Clinton launched by the United States House Judiciary Committee stemmed from his extramarital affair with Monica Lewinsky. The affair came to light amid an investigation led by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr, who originally was probing other matters related to the Clinton administration. The connection between the affair and potential perjury or obstruction of justice created significant political turmoil. The hearings were held in the House of Representatives, where Judiciary Committee members scrutinized evidence and testimonies relating to whether Clinton's actions warranted impeachment. Following extensive public dissemination of the affair's details and the legal ramifications, the hearings became a focal point of political discourse in the country.

The proceedings featured contentious debates among lawmakers, as some Democrats framed the hearings as a partisan effort to undermine a sitting president, while Republicans sought accountability for perceived misdeeds. High-profile figures and legal experts were brought forward to express their views on the constitutional implications of impeachment and the moral standing of the President. The public was deeply divided along partisan lines, reflecting broader political polarization in the U.S. at the time. Clinton’s aides and friends were also drawn into the hearings, providing testimonies that both supported and challenged the President's narrative regarding the affair.

Ultimately, the hearings culminated in a formal impeachment vote in the House, where Clinton was impeached on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice, making him only the second U.S. president to be impeached. However, he was acquitted by the Senate. These events showcased the intersection of personal conduct and public office, raising questions about the limits of accountability for elected officials and the role of political opposition in the American system.