As discussions heightening around the prospect of a war in Iraq gained momentum in late 2002 and early 2003, NATO allies were faced with complex strategic considerations, particularly concerning Turkey's position as a potential frontline state. Recognizing the strategic importance of Turkey in the event of military action against Iraq, the U.S. proposed a series of protective measures for the Turkish military. Traditionally, NATO operates under a procedure of consensus and non-objection, often termed 'silent approval', wherein members can support an action without formally voicing their agreement, thereby avoiding the need for lengthy deliberations. However, on October 2, 2003, France and Belgium actively broke this consensus for the first time, signaling their opposition to the proposed measures designed to reinforce Turkey amidst their military preparations. This development created significant rifts within NATO, demonstrating differing perspectives on the Iraq conflict and raising questions about the collective defense commitments enshrined in Article 5 of the NATO treaty. Furthermore, this opposition positioned France and Belgium as critical voices against what many perceived as an unjustified military engagement led by the United States.