In a dramatic turn of events, Ratu Josefa Iloilo announced the abrogation of Fiji's constitution and assumed absolute control over the governance of the nation. This declaration came in the wake of lingering political instability that had plagued Fiji since a military coup in 2006, led by Commodore Frank Bainimarama. Iloilo's actions were purportedly aimed at stabilizing the government and addressing ongoing issues of governance and democracy. He cited the need for reform and a framework to guide the country toward a brighter future. However, this unilateral decision raised serious concerns about the rule of law and democratic principles, sparking widespread protests and debates about legitimate governance in the Pacific nation.

As Iloilo dissolved the constitution, he rendered Fijian institutions inoperative, leaving many citizens confused and alarmed. In the lead-up to this event, the military regime had already suspended democratic processes and parliament, further entrenching its power. The international community responded with a mix of criticism and calls for the restoration of democratic governance, leading to increased isolation of Fiji in the geopolitical sphere. The situation raised concerns about human rights abuses and the suppression of civil liberties, issues that would linger in Fiji's political climate for years to come.

The resulting constitutional crisis challenged the very fabric of governance, leading to long-term implications for Fiji's democratic structures. Those advocating for democracy feared the erosion of civil rights, while supporters of the regime viewed it as a necessary step towards stability. The abrogation underscored the fragility of democracy in Fiji and highlighted the tensions between military and civilian authorities in the region.