Supreme Court Limits Quotas in College Admissions
June 28th, 1978
June 28th, 1978

How Long Ago?
46 years, 8 months, 15 days ago
Location
Washington, D.C., United States
Category
Education & Academia
People
- Thurgood Marshall
- William H. Rehnquist
- Allan Bakke
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Links & References
Tags
Supreme Court Limits Quotas in College Admissions
The Supreme Court ruled in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, determining that while affirmative action was permissible, racial quotas in college admissions were unconstitutional. Allan Bakke, a white applicant, challenged the University of California, Davis Medical School's system that reserved a certain number of spots for minority candidates. The Court's decision significantly impacted college admission policies across the United States.
Allan Bakke challenged UC Davis Medical School's policy.
Supreme Court ruled 5-4 on the case.
Racial quotas in admissions were declared unconstitutional.
Affirmative action remains permissible under certain conditions.
What Happened?
The case of Regents of the University of California v. Bakke centered on Allan Bakke, a white applicant who had been denied admission to the University of California, Davis Medical School despite having higher test scores than some minority applicants who were admitted under a special admissions program. Bakke contended that the program's quota system was discriminatory against him based on his race. He argued that such practices violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
In a landmark 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court concluded that affirmative action programs aiming to increase diversity in higher education were constitutionally valid. However, the Court struck down the specific racial quota system used by UC Davis, ruling that it violated the Equal Protection Clause. The justices emphasized that while the pursuit of diversity was an important state interest, racial quotas denied individuals equal consideration in the admissions process. This nuanced ruling presented a complex view of affirmative action that permitted some forms of race-conscious admissions, provided they did not adhere to strict quotas.
The split decision did not establish a single precedent but rather led to varied interpretations across institutions. It clarified that, although race could be considered in admissions processes, it could not be the defining factor or used to fulfill numerical quotas. The ramifications of this ruling influenced both college admissions practices and discussions on affirmative action for decades to come. Schools across the nation had to reevaluate their policies, ensuring they aligned with the Court's guidance while still striving to maintain diversity within their student bodies.
Why Does it Matter?
The Supreme Court's ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was significant as it shaped the landscape of affirmative action in higher education. It created a legal framework wherein institutions could pursue diversity without relying on rigid quotas, championing a more nuanced understanding of race in admissions. The case prompted ongoing debates about equality, fairness, and access to education, challenging universities to balance diversity goals with compliance to constitutional rights.
Discover More Historic Events from June 28th
Terrorist Attack at Istanbul Atatürk Airport
A suicide bombing and gun attack occurred at Istanbul Atatürk Airport, resulting in the deaths of 42 individuals and injuring over 230. The attackers opened fire on passengers before detonating explosives in the terminal. This incident led to heightened security measures across Turkey and increased international concerns regarding terrorism.
Continue ReadingMilitary Coup Against Manuel Zelaya in Honduras
Manuel Zelaya, the President of Honduras, was ousted in a military coup following a failed attempt to hold a referendum aimed at rewriting the Honduran Constitution. The coup was executed by the military and supported by various sectors of society who opposed Zelaya's growing authoritarianism. This event marked the onset of a profound constitutional crisis that would lead to increased political tension and instability in the region.
Continue ReadingSovereignty Transferred to Interim Government of Iraq
The Coalition Provisional Authority officially transferred sovereignty to the new interim government of Iraq, ending the direct U.S.-led administration. The transfer marked a significant political transition following the invasion of Iraq in 2003. Iyad Allawi was appointed as the interim Prime Minister, leading a cabinet comprising both Iraqis and representatives from various ethnic and sectarian groups, reflecting the diverse makeup of the country.
Continue ReadingMilošević Extradition to The Hague
Slobodan Milošević, former President of Yugoslavia, was extradited to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague, Netherlands, to face charges of war crimes. His extradition followed years of political unrest and international pressure for accountability regarding the atrocities committed during the Yugoslav Wars in the 1990s.
Continue ReadingMike Tyson Bites Evander Holyfield's Ear
In a highly charged rematch, Mike Tyson was disqualified in the third round for biting Evander Holyfield's ear. This shocking incident occurred during a heavyweight boxing championship held at the MGM Grand in Las Vegas, Nevada, sparking widespread outrage and capture global media attention. Tyson's actions followed a contentious bout where frustrations escalated, leading to one of boxing's most infamous moments.
Continue ReadingSlobodan Milošević's Gazimestan Speech
Slobodan Milošević delivered a key speech at Gazimestan, marking the 600th anniversary of the Battle of Kosovo. The speech occurred before a large crowd of Serbian supporters, emphasizing themes of national pride and unity. Milošević's address was a cornerstone in promoting Serbian nationalism, invoking memories of Kosovo's historical significance during the medieval period. His rhetoric resonated deeply with many, as it aimed to revitalize a sense of identity amongst Serbs.
Continue Reading