Slobodan Milošević, the former President of Yugoslavia, was extradited to the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague amid mounting evidence and accusations of war crimes, including genocide. This significant moment marked the first time a sitting head of state was sent to trial for such charges, underscoring the global movement toward accountability in international law. His extradition was preceded by a series of political changes in Yugoslavia, including Milošević's ousting from power in 2000 and increased pressure from various international bodies—particularly the United States and the European Union—to ensure that he faced justice for his role in the violence and ethnic cleansing that occurred during the breakup of Yugoslavia.After his extradition, the trial proceedings began, drawing international media attention and raising questions about sovereignty, justice, and the role of international law in post-conflict societies. The hearings aimed to address not only the grim legacy of the Yugoslav Wars but also to challenge the concept of impunity for leaders who commit crimes against humanity. Milošević's defense strategy involved claims of political manipulation and the assertion that he was acting within the context of the conflict to protect Serb interests. His time at the ICTY marked a pivotal moment in the development of international legal norms regarding war crimes and accountability for leaders' actions in wartime.Throughout his trial, Milošević maintained his innocence, arguing that the charges were politically motivated. Despite his health issues leading to interruptions in the proceedings, the trial absorbed worldwide interest and reflected the challenges of post-war reconciliation in the Balkans. The ICTY's work and judgment on Milošević's conduct sought to provide a measure of justice for the victims of the conflicts of the 1990s and has influenced the discourse on international criminal law practices significantly.