In a significant policy change, the United States Army formally abolished flogging as a method of punishment for soldiers. This initiative emerged from a broader military reform movement that sought to address the inhumane treatment of personnel and adapt to evolving societal values regarding discipline and human rights during the Civil War era. Flogging, which involved punishment through beating, was previously a common disciplinary measure within the military, often used for insubordination and various offenses. However, by the early 1860s, growing public and governmental pressure began to challenge the use of such severe corporal punishment. The decision to abolish flogging was influenced by changing attitudes towards military discipline, reflecting a desire to cultivate respect and dignity within the ranks. The U.S. Army aimed to transform its image amidst the backdrop of conflict, presenting itself as a more progressive and humane institution. The abolition was also practical; there was recognition that morale could be adversely affected by punitive practices that were deemed excessively harsh. These reforms were marked by a transition towards alternative disciplinary measures, focusing on correcting behavior without resorting to physical punishment. This move paralleled wider social movements advocating for reform in penal systems and military practices alike, which were gaining momentum during this turbulent period in American history.