Excommunication of Pope Honorius I Confirmed
The Sixth Ecumenical Council excommunicated Pope Honorius I after his death due to accusations of heresy. Convened in Constantinople, the council addressed the controversy surrounding Monothelitism, a belief that Christ had only one will. The council condemned the teachings attributed to Honorius, asserting that his support of Monothelitism had led the Church into confusion. The declaration was a significant moment in establishing the Church's position on Christological doctrines.
Pope Honorius I upheld Monothelitism teachings.
The council reaffirmed Christ's two distinct wills.
Honorius I was excommunicated after his death.
This marked a shift in Church authority dynamics.
What Happened?
The Sixth Ecumenical Council, convened in Constantinople between 680 and 681, focused primarily on the Christological controversy of Monothelitism, which proposed that Jesus Christ operated under a single divine will rather than two distinct wills—one divine and one human. This theological debate was significant in early Christianity as it touched upon the nature of Christ and the implications for human salvation and the incarnation. Pope Honorius I, who reigned prior to this council, had been accused of supporting Monothelitism through his letters that seemed to endorse this view. Although he had died in 638, the ramifications of his teachings persisted. The Council sought to clarify the Church's stance against Monothelitism and to condemn its proponents, reaffirming the belief in Christ's two wills. The condemnation of Honorius I, along with the formal excommunication, was a decisive moment. It contributed to the conceptual parting of the ways between various factions within the Church, making a strong statement regarding the authority of ecumenical councils over papal teachings. The ruling confirmed that no pope's opinion could supersede what was deemed necessary for the true doctrine of faith.
Why Does it Matter?
The posthumous excommunication of Pope Honorius I is significant because it highlighted the evolving relationship between papal authority and ecumenical decrees. This event marked a pivotal moment in the history of the Church, illustrating that even the highest ecclesiastical office must align with established doctrine. It served as a cautionary tale about theological leadership and accountability within Christian doctrine, shaping subsequent understandings of papal infallibility and the limits of papal authority.