Domitian's Assassination and Nerva's Succession
Emperor Domitian faced a conspiracy leading to his assassination, orchestrated by his wife Domitia and two Praetorian prefects, marking a sudden shift in Roman leadership. The plot, driven by widespread discontent against Domitian’s authoritarian rule, successfully resulted in his death, allowing Nerva to be proclaimed as the new emperor. This transition was significant in shaping a new era for the Roman Empire.
Domitian's rule ended with a palace assassination.
Domitia and prefects led the conspiracy against him.
Nerva was chosen as his immediate successor.
Transition marked a shift in imperial governance.
What Happened?
In a dramatic turn of events, Emperor Domitian, who had ruled Rome since 81 AD, was assassinated due to a carefully planned conspiracy involving his wife, Domitia, alongside two influential Praetorian prefects. Domitian's reign was characterized by autocratic governance and paranoia, leading to a climate of fear. His declining popularity and erratic policies sparked increasing unrest among the elites of Rome, creating an environment ripe for conspiracy. The conspirators aimed to end his tyrannical rule, motivated by a sense of obligation to restore the health of the imperium. The plan was executed successfully on September 18, 96 AD, culminating in his death within the palace. Following his assassination, the Senate quickly proclaimed Marcus Cocceius Nerva as the new emperor. Nerva was a senator held in high regard, known for his moderate policies and intentions to restore senatorial power. His ascent signified a crucial pivot towards greater cooperation between the emperor and the Senate, setting a precedent for governance in the following years.
Why Does it Matter?
The assassination of Domitian and the subsequent rise of Nerva marked a transformative moment in the history of the Roman Empire. This event signaled the end of the Flavian dynasty and initiated the Nervan-Antonine period, often regarded as a time of relative peace and stability known as the 'Five Good Emperors.' The shift in leadership represented a move from authoritarian rule towards a more collaborative form of governance, significantly impacting subsequent political dynamics in Rome.