In response to the deadly Uri attack that killed 19 Indian soldiers, the Indian Army conducted surgical strikes against suspected militant camps located in Pakistani-administered Kashmir. The operation was carried out in the early hours of the morning, targeting multiple locations where militants were believed to be preparing for cross-border infiltration. Indian officials claimed that the strikes were executed with precision and aimed at minimizing collateral damage while delivering a significant blow to the infrastructure of militant groups operating in the area.

The strikes were part of India’s broader strategy to tackle Pakistan-based terrorism and were justified as a necessary response to the escalating violence that had plagued the region. Official statements emphasized that this was not an act of war but rather a targeted military operation to safeguard national interests and to signal that India would respond decisively to continued provocations. The operation highlighted India's resolve to combat terrorism and demonstrated their willingness to take proactive measures rather than being reactive.

Following the operation, emotional responses varied across both countries. In India, the strikes were largely supported and hailed as a strong response, while in Pakistan, it was viewed with alarm, prompting officials to deny that such strikes had occurred. This military action marked a watershed moment in India-Pakistan relations, potentially changing the dynamics of conflict in Kashmir and raising questions about future engagements along the Line of Control.